Sep. 29th, 2005

litharriel: (Default)
Ghost Town
Down at the End of the World, Houses Walk and the Dead Rise Up

By Manuel Roig-Franzia
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 21, 2005; Page C01


DAVANT, La. Directions to Davant are simple: "Go to the end of the
world and turn left."

End-of-the-world Louisiana means going down, deep down, past New
Orleans and its silent, flooded neighborhoods, through ruined St.
Bernard Parish where the oil spilled after Hurricane Katrina, and
down even deeper, down into the sinking marshes and bayous of
Plaquemines Parish, where Creoles with lyrical French names talk
matter-of-factly of walking the levee next to ghosts and spirits.
Down to Davant.

Except now it's hard to say what is Davant and what isn't Davant. New
Orleans filled up with water slowly. Davant was swept away fast,
destroying the false sense of security that ever-taller levees gave
to the place. Even in battered New Orleans, tones go hushed when
conversations turn to Plaquemines (PLACK-uh-min), which takes its
name from a Native American word for persimmon. "It's worse down
there, bad, bad, bad," they say.

This is where Katrina acted like a tsunami, treating the big "ring
levee" that comes to a looping end south of town--bent in the shape
of a paper clip--as if it were a child's sand castle. The Mississippi
River came roaring through here, frothy and white and mean, up over
the levee on one side of town, and the salty marsh water broke
through the levee on the other.

Plaquemines is the place where the people who want to resurrect New
Orleans, people such as President Bush, who has vowed "to build the
levees higher" to protect the Crescent City, might look for lessons,
and where people who love the marsh and build the levees want
everyone to take note. It was the first line of defense thrown up by
human beings against Katrina, and it buckled, unable to withstand a
surge that cascaded through fraying marshes that in another era might
have slowed the water.

"Plaquemines has been kind of out of the news," Lt. Gen. Carl Strock,
commander of the Army Corps of Engineers, said recently. "But
clearly, it's an important area, it needs to be brought back up."

All that's left on some blocks in this town of 900, and some of the
neighboring communities along the levee, are concrete stoops. That's
it. Churches and stores simply vanished and a big chunk of the road
that is so important to maintaining Louisiana's rich oil fields is
washed away. Sturdy wood frame houses that survived when the wind got
strong and the water got high in the past were ground into kindling,
reduced to mere smudges of color on the sloping sides of the river
levees.

The levee that failed to protect Davant is twice as tall now, local
officials say, as it was when Hurricane Camille blasted through the
parish in 1969. All that extra dirt and clay had a lulling effect,
and the men and women who worked the oil fields out in the marsh, or
plied the bayous for oysters, got to thinking Davant was a safe place.

"People felt pretty good with the levee 18, 19 feet high," said John
Barthelemy, a parish councilman with droopy eyes and a quick
smile. "They'd say, 'Now we have the levees. We don't have to worry
about water. We'll just worry about wind.' "

Wind and legends, that is. The Creole boys and girls down here put as
much faith in the tales of their grandmothers -- their memeres -- as
they do in the Army Corps of Engineers. And the memeres said
Plaquemines was fated for doom. As the legend goes, the people of
lower Plaquemines took vengeance on a priest in the early 1800s,
killing him after he was accused of committing a heinous crime. That
act of vigilantism -- passed from generation to generation in scary
bedtime stories filled with werewolves called loups-garous and
screaming "yi, yi, yi" spirits -- came with consequences, the memeres
warned.

"There was something about 'thou shalt not kill,' " Simon Duplessis,
70, said as he looked for pieces of his small private plane on the
narrow strip of land that his ancestors have owned since 1820. "Dad
said the place was cursed."

Certainly Plaquemines, which now has a population of about 29,000,
has suffered. During the great Mississippi River flood of 1927, the
wealthy men upstream in New Orleans decided to save their city by
blowing up a downstream levee and flooding Plaquemines. For decades,
the parish was a corrupt kingdom ruled in dictatorial fashion by
Judge Leander Perez, an iconic segregationist whose blunt,
inflammatory speeches in the 1950s and '60s made him a national
figure in the Southern stand against integration.

The Plaquemines that Judge Perez ruled looks like a cursed place now.
Cattle roam untended on deserted streets, and pecan trees -- once
tall and majestic -- lie down in the fields, toppled and broken. The
lush groves that produced satsumas, sweet oranges coveted each
harvest season by Louisianians, have gone brittle and brown, burned
crispy by 14 feet of salty water that came through a 200-foot-wide
break in the marsh levee.

On the other side is wild Louisiana, part land, part water, a place
that was vanishing even before Katrina, and that environmentalists
are begging harder than ever for the federal government to
restore. "As a child I always used to think, 'What's beyond this?'"
said Duplessis, who remembers going for swims in the Mississippi with
his father. "The ducks would fly off, and I would always wonder where
in the world they would go."

This part of Plaquemines once had a boomtown feel to it. A railroad
passed near the Duplessis home, to bring in supplies for the oil rigs
and bring out rice and oranges and pecans. The country stores held
Friday night dances and showed movies. But the marsh has been
dropping steadily -- it has grown more sickly over the years as the
Mississippi was trapped in a man-made channel that prevented it from
spreading silt. Each year it sinks up to an inch. The lower it goes,
the worse the storm surges become, and the more inhospitable the
place becomes, even with its bigger levees.

"The ones who are left are pretty much your die-hards," said Gina
Meyer, a Plaquemines native who cruised over submerged neighborhoods
in an airboat to grab people off rooftops.

Die-hards and, to hear the locals tell it, ghosts. Even Barthelemy, a
feet-on-the-ground sort who commandeered school buses to evacuate
residents before Katrina struck, talks about the spirits. On the
night before the storm, Barthelemy says quite seriously, a good
friend of his walked home with a whole pack of ghosts. Barthelemy
asked him if he was scared, and the man replied, "What they gonna do?
The dead can't hurt me."

Lynell Williams, born and raised in Plaquemines Parish, felt a sense
of foreboding around the same time. She says she saw two lines of
ghosts--"bright people," she noted, invoking a local colloquialism
for whites--marching over the levee. The ghosts were getting out of
Davant. That was all she needed to see. She left, too.

Williams, who has been trying to find her house, also can't find her
church. Bethlehem African Judea Baptist was strong enough to stick
around for 143 years, celebrating an anniversary on the weekend
before Katrina arrived. Now the sturdy brick sanctuary has gone
missing. All that remains is the sign out front, which seems to
invite congregants to a 43rd-anniversary party. The "1" fell off.

"That Katrina, she really pitched a party," Williams said, shifting
the blue kerchief on her head and wiping tears on the spot her church
once stood. "We just in slow motion. I feel like I'm in a dream."

Up the road another house of worship, St. Thomas, is a skeleton, its
windows and doors blown out, its brick frame chipped and scraped, but
still standing. Meyer was baptized there, celebrated her First
Communion there and was married there, following the same track that
the faithful in Davant have gone down since they broke ground for the
church in 1844. She'll pray there again, she says, even though it's
hard to imagine anyone but the buzzards inhabiting this place for a
long, long time.

Out back, there are people crying in the cemetery, walking slowly
past headstones that commemorate the French and Creole families that
made this place: the Fontenelles and Gravolets and Falgouts. No one
should have to see what the weeping men and women in the burial
ground are seeing, but they linger there, blinking their eyes, as if
refocusing will bring some sense to what lies before them.

The aboveground sarcophagi, which performed so well in storm after
storm for decade after decade, couldn't hold on anymore. The lids
popped off more than a dozen, and some let their coffins go floating
out. A delicately carved wooden casket lies in the middle of the main
path, upside down. Mud cakes its sides. And the little white angel
figurines that once looked to the heavens from each of the coffin's
corners are now staring straight down.
litharriel: (Default)
21/09/2005 - 5:35:11 PM


The body of a Romanian nun who died in June during an exorcism ritual
was exhumed today for forensic tests, the state news agency reported.

Irina Maricica Cornici, 23, died June 15 at the secluded Holy Trinity
convent in the north-east Romanian village of Tanacu after she was
tied up for several days without food or water and chained to a cross
during the ritual.

The exorcism ritual was led by Daniel Petru Corogeanu, 29, a monk who
served as the convent's priest, and four other nuns.

The five were charged with murder and denying a person's freedom, and
released from jail on July 27 pending trial. No trial date has been
set.

Prosecutors and forensic doctors arrived this morning in the village
of Perieni, Cornici's home village, where the nun is buried, the
Rompres news agency reported.

Before that, Cornici's parents mourned at their daughter's grave and
prayed.

"It is good that they exhumed her, maybe this way the truth will come
out and those who killed her will pay," her father, Costica Antohi,
was quoted as saying by Rompres.

The exhumation was requested by Corogeanu a few weeks ago, in a bid
to prove his innocence, and the General Prosecutor's Office agreed
earlier this month.

"Through this exhumation we hope to find out the real causes of the
death," Rompres quoted the suspects' lawyer, Maria Ilisei, as
saying. "It will be a complex affair to provide all the answers that
remained unanswered from the first examination."

Cornici's death stunned Romania and prompted the Orthodox Church to
promise reforms, including psychological tests for those seeking to
enter monasteries.

The church, which has benefited from a religious revival in recent
years, condemned the Tanacu ritual as "abominable" and banned
Corogeanu from the priesthood and excluded the four nuns from the
church.

In 1999, when the Vatican issued its first new guidelines since 1614
for driving out devils, it urged priests to take modern psychiatry
into account in deciding who should be exorcised.
litharriel: (Default)
Theocrats for Christ
Agnosticism/Atheism Blog
From Austin Cline,
Your Guide to Agnosticism / Atheism.
Stay up to date!
September 11, 2005

Theocrats for Christ
Some people object to using the word "theocrat" to describe members of the Christian Right and "theocracy" to describe the sort of society they seek. More and more of them, though, are becoming open and honest about the fact that this is exactly what they want: an America which is run according to their interpretation of what their god wants.

Stephanie Simon writes:

Through seminars taught by conservative college professors and devout members of Congress, the students learn that serving country means first and always serving Christ.

They learn to view every vote as a religious duty, and to consider compromise a sin.

That puts them at the vanguard of a bold effort by evangelical conservatives to mold a new generation of leaders who will answer not to voters, but to God.

“We help them understand God’s purpose for society,” said Bouma, who coordinates the program, known as the Statesmanship Institute, for the Rev. D. James Kennedy. [Los Angeles Times]

Read the emphasized passages again: a particular position on any vote is a religious duty, not a civic issue. Compromising is a sin (presumably because, with one particular position being a religious duty, it is thought that God demands a particular position and compromising means going against the will of God). Political leaders do not serve the people, they serve God.

If they don’t serve the people, what would be the point in seeking their votes? What would be the point in even allowing them to vote and, thus, giving them the opportunity to vote incorrectly? Wouldn’t it be a religious duty to ensure that the only ones in charge are always those who serve God, rather than the people?

The seminars proved a revelation. In one, [Myal] Greene [deputy press secretary for a Republican congressman from Florida] learned that ministers ran many of America’s earliest schools. He hadn’t thought much about education policy before that class. Now he plans to fight for history lessons on the Founding Fathers’ faith, science lessons drawn from the Book of Genesis and public school prayer.

And what about non-Christians? What about Christians who don’t agree with Greene’s interpretations? They don’t matter. For Greene, this is now a religious duty and compromise would be a sin. Greene serves God, not the voters in Florida. He will fight for legislation that he believes God wants, not what the voters want.

Now the director of the Eagle Forum, a conservative lobbying group founded by Phyllis Schlafly, [Jessica] Echard says Jesus would approve of a call for lower taxes: “God calls on us to be stewards of our [own] money.”

She dips into the Bible to explain her opposition to most global treaties, reasoning that Americans have a holy obligation to protect their God-given freedom by avoiding foreign entanglements.

“The Scripture talks of taking every thought and making it captive to Christ, and that’s what the Statesmanship Institute helps us do,” Echard said. [...]

Hannah Woody, for instance, came away from the institute’s seminars confident that abolishing the Department of Education is not just a Republican goal, but also a Christian imperative. The Bible gives parents — not some distant bureaucracy — the primary responsibility for raising children, said Woody...

Jessica Echard has absolutely no idea what Jesus would have thought about most modern political institutions. When Jesus spoke about taxes, he advised paying them — he said nothing about what the proper amount should be (and evidence indicates that taxes at the time were pretty crushing, so if he objected to high taxes, he managed to hide it). Jesus said nothing about global treaties and he certainly never mentioned America as a land with a “holy obligation” to do anything at all, much less an obligation to avoid treaties.

What people like Echard are doing is making their thoughts captive to a uniquely American view of Christianity. Other Christians around the world do not share these views, and perhaps that’s one reason why people like Echard don’t want to be “yoked” with them: they don’t want to be reminded too much that there are other, equally valid Christian positions on social issues.

*shivers*

Sep. 29th, 2005 12:50 am
litharriel: (Default)
In Evolution Debate, Creationists Are Breaking New Ground
Museum Dedicated to Biblical Interpretation Of the World Is Being
Built Near Cincinnati

By Michael Powell
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 25, 2005; A03



PETERSBURG, Ky. -- The guide, a soft-spoken fellow with a scholarly
aspect, walks through the halls of this handsome, half-finished
museum and points to the sculpture of a young velociraptor.

"We're placing this one in the hall that explains the post-Flood
world," explains the guide. "When dinosaurs lived with man."

A reporter has a question or two about this dinosaur-man business,
but Mark Looy -- the guide and a vice president at the museum --
already has walked over to the lifelike head of a T. rex, with its
three-inch teeth and carnivore's grin.

"We call him our 'missionary lizard,' " Looy says. "When people
realize the T. rex lived in Eden, it will lead us to a discussion of
the gospel. The T. rex once was a vegetarian, too."

The nation's largest museum devoted to the alternative reality that
is biblical creation science is rising just outside Cincinnati. Set
amid a park and three-acre artificial lake, the 50,000-square-foot
museum features animatronic dinosaurs, state-of-the-art models and
graphics, and a half-dozen staff scientists. It holds that the world
and the universe are but 6,000 years old and that baby dinosaurs rode
in Noah's ark.

The $25 million Creation Museum stands much of modern science on its
head and might cause a paleontologist or three to rend their
garments. But officials expect to attract hundreds of thousands of
visitors when the museum opens in early 2007.

"Evolutionary Darwinists need to understand we are taking the
dinosaurs back," says Kenneth Ham, president of Answers in Genesis-
USA, which is building the museum. "This is a battle cry to recognize
the science in the revealed truth of God."

"Intelligent design," the theory that the machinery of life is so
complex as to require the hand -- subtle or not -- of an intelligent
creator, has stolen the media thunder of late. This week a trial will
begin in federal court in Pennsylvania, in which 11 parents accuse
the Dover school board of violating the separation of church and
state by requiring high school biology teachers to read a statement
in class that intelligent design is an alternative explanation of
life's origins.

Most scientists dismiss intelligent design as flawed science, and
they fear cultural conservatives intend it as a religious wedge. The
small band of scientists who promote intelligent design retort that
theirs is a scientific inquiry, albeit with theistic implications.

But by any measure, Young Earth Creationism -- which holds that the
Bible is the literal word of God and that He created the universe in
seven days-- has a more powerful hold on the beliefs of Americans
than evolutionary theory or intelligent design. That grip grows
stronger by the year.

Polls taken last year showed that 45 percent of Americans believe
that God created humans in their present form 10,000 years ago (or
less) and that man shares no common ancestor with the ape. Only 26
percent believe in the central tenet of evolution, that all life
descended from a single ancestor.

Another poll showed that 65 percent of Americans want creationism
taught alongside evolution.

In the early 20th century, many creationist thinkers viewed Genesis
as metaphorical, accepting that Earth formed over hundreds of
thousands, even millions of years. But as society became more
secular, and science offered an implicit challenge to fundamentalist
beliefs, creationist leaders took a more literal line.

"The creationists have been very successful in persuading
conservative Christians to abandon any nonliteral interpretation of
the Bible," said Ronald L. Numbers, a professor at the University of
Wisconsin at Madison and author of "The Creationists." "There is a
very large constituency of Americans who are quite comfortable with
Young Earth Creationism."

To drive past the stegosaurus silhouettes at the gate to the parking
lot at the Creation Museum here is to enter a creationist world in
great ferment. Answers in Genesis is one of about a half-dozen
creationist organizations and museums, each with its own
headquarters, radio studios and Web sites, and scholarly and popular
magazines. (A family-oriented column even ferrets out covert
evolutionary messages in "Finding Nemo" and "My Big Fat Greek
Wedding.")

Another creationist museum launches expeditions to the Papua New
Guinea highlands in search of living pterodactyls.

All of this -- creationist zoology, paleontology, archaeology -- is
framed in a distinctive academic language.

So one reads of post-Babel studies, and floodology and post-diluvium
studies, these being the study of the world after Noah and the Great
Flood, which is regarded as purest fact. The sanctified imagination,
which is to say inspired by God, helps the scientists and artists at
Creation Museum re-create the world of Adam and Eve, from sauropods
playing with children to the "humongous" mature trees that God
created in a single day.

"Our artists anticipated some challenging . . . work," the Answers of
Genesis Web site notes.

Young Earth Creationists emphasize the rigor of their science. Looy
rattles off the names of experts with doctorates, many of whom
obtained degrees from mainstream universities. A creationist
scientist, Kurt Wise, worked as a graduate student at Harvard with
prominent biologist Stephen Jay Gould. John Baumgardner of the Los
Alamos National Laboratory became a well-regarded designer of
computer models for planetary catastrophes.

They herald successes. Recent discoveries by geologists tend to
support creationists' beliefs that great floods -- albeit not
necessarily ordered up by God -- played a role in gouging out some
canyon lands.

But often, scientists say, the creationist bottom line is a through-
the-looking-glass version of science. The scientific method of
theory, experiment and assumptions upended does not apply. Ask Ham if
he could accept evidence that conflicts with his reading of Genesis --
proof, say, that a fossil is more than 6,000 years old -- and he
shakes his head.

Creationists believe man became mortal when God cast Adam and Eve out
of Eden 6,000 years ago. Death did not exist before that.

"We admit we have an axiom: We have a book and it's the Bible and
it's revealed history," says Ham. "Where the Bible teaches on
science, we can trust it as the word of God."

Scientists place the age of Earth at 4.5 billion years. Many tend to
act resigned at the mention of creationists, seeing a worldview so
different as to defy debate.

"There are people who are prepared to accept that the universe is a
pretty untidy place," said Ian Tattersall, a curator at the American
Museum of Natural History. "And there are people, like the
creationists, whose minds rebel at this notion."

Ham, whose voice carries broad hints of his native Australia, is a
charismatic speaker and skilled debater, and he has built Answers in
Genesis into the world's leading creationist organization in less
than a decade. He raised nearly $20 million to build the museum, and
the average donation was about $70, officials say.

Answers in Genesis hews to no particular evangelical line. Ham's
politics lean strongly to the right, seeing America as under siege by
homosexuality and abortion. In a recent column for the Rev. Jerry
Falwell's newspaper, Ham described his mission as "fighting
the 'Philistines' of our day."

"By and large, much of the church has compromised God's Word in
Genesis by allowing millions of years and evolutionary ideas to be
embraced by God's people," Ham wrote. "We need to take back the
maligned Grand Canyon, the majestic mountain ranges, the massive coal
beds . . . and the dinosaur fossils."

Ham is ambivalent on the question of intelligent design. He admires
the movement's founders and applauds their battles. But he is
skeptical of creationists who see intelligent design as a battering
ram that might smash down the constitutional doors and allow the
Bible back into schools.

"They are not a Christian movement, they are not about the Bible," he
says in his spacious corner office at the museum. "It's not even
against evolution, not really, because they don't tell you what that
intelligence is. It could open a door for Muslim belief, for Hindus,
for New Age.

"We are telling you unashamedly that the word of the Bible is the
way."




http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
dyn/content/article/2005/09/24/AR2005092401262_pf.html
litharriel: (Default)
PSA from the good folks at the Family Research Council....

1) Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, liposuction and air conditioning.
2) Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall.
3) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract.
4) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal.
5) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Britney Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed.
6) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children.
7) Obviously, gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children.
8) Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America.
9) Children can never succeed without both a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.
10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans...

*Re-post this if you believe that laws against gay marriage are just plain stupid.
litharriel: (Default)
Coyote
Indeed, you are 79% erudite, 87% sensual, 62% martial, and 91% saturnine.
Coyote was an important being to several Native American
tribes. He was one of those tricksters that are found in several world
mythologies, in fact very close in temperament and deed to Loki of the Norse pantheon.


Eternally scavenging for food, he represents the most basic instincts,
but in other narratives, he is also the father of the Indian people and
a potent conductor of spiritual forces in the form of sacred dreams. In
the �Myth of the Stars and the Moon� he is shown as a wise counsellor
even.

There are more stories about him than stars in the sky. For
example, did you hear the one about the �Spying Moon�? It seems that
someone had pinched the moon, and Coyote offered to stand in as
replacement. Everyone agreed that he made a fine moon, but from his
elevated position Coyote could see everything that was going on. Being
of an irritating disposition, he couldn't resist blowing the whistle on
friends and enemies alike. "Hey, look what Badger is doing behind his
tepee!"


Pretty soon everyone was sick of his snooping and voted him out of the
sky. But nothing can keep Coyote down for long. Being an old show-off,
he loves to impress the girls by juggling his eyeballs. One day he
threw one so high it got stuck in the sky and became the star Arcturus.
So even now he's keeping an eye on us all.


The Fifteen Gods


These are the 15 categories of this test. If you score above average in �


�all or none of the four variables: Dagda. �
Erudite: Thoth. �
Sensual: Frey. �
Martial: Mars. �
Saturnine: Mictlantecuhtli. �

Erudite & Sensual: Amun. �
Erudite & Martial: Odin. �
Erudite & Saturnine: Anubis. �
Sensual & Martial: Zeus. �
Sensual & Saturnine: Cernunnos. �
Martial & Saturnine: Loki. �

Erudite, Sensual & Martial: Lug. �
Erudite, Sensual & Saturnine: Coyote. �
Erudite, Martial & Saturnine: Hades. �
Sensual, Martial & Saturnine: Pan.




My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 58% on erudite
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 83% on sensual
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 64% on martial
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 97% on saturnine
Link: The Mythological God Test written by Nitsuki on Ok Cupid


You scored as Loner.

</td>

Loner

88%

Drama nerd

56%

Geek

50%

Goth

38%

Punk/Rebel

31%

Stoner

31%

Prep/Jock/Cheerleader

19%

Ghetto gangsta

6%

What's Your High School Stereotype?
created with QuizFarm.com


stone key
You are a stone key, and you unlock old and magical
secrets. What you have to offer is powerful and
difficult for many to understand, but
invaluable to the few who can truly grasp it.
Give the things you have carefully and
wisely, because not everyone will use them for
good.


What sort of key are you and what do you unlock?
brought to you by Quizilla

the Wit
(66% dark, 30% spontaneous, 31% vulgar)
your humor style:
CLEAN | COMPLEX | DARK




You like things edgy, subtle, and smart. I guess that means you're
probably an intellectual, but don't take that to mean pretentious. You
realize 'dumb' can be witty--after all isn't that the Simpsons'
philosophy?--but rudeness for its own sake, 'gross-out' humor and most
other things found in a fraternity leave you totally flat.

I guess you just have a more cerebral approach than most. You have the perfect mindset for a joke writer or staff writer.

Your sense of humor takes the most thought to appreciate, but it's also the best, in my opinion.



You probably loved the Office. If you don't know what I'm
talking about, check it out here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/theoffice/.



PEOPLE LIKE YOU: Jon Stewart - Woody Allen - Ricky Gervais







The 3-Variable Funny Test!

- it rules -




If you're interested, try my latest:
The Terrorism Test




My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 86% on darkness
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 12% on spontaneity
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 35% on vulgarity
Link: The 3 Variable Funny Test written by jason_bateman on Ok Cupid

Profile

litharriel: (Default)
litharriel

December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
1920 2122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 29th, 2025 04:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios